Harm minimisation and pharmaconutrition

Y Coleman,

27th September 2022

Examples of PharmacoNutrition ie some common blood tests impacted by some commonly prescribed medicines

​Mechanisms and consequences

Supported by policies, practices and programs, harm minimisation is essentially a philosophy, in a range of sectors, to minimise harm rather than to prevent harm.

Harm minimisation applications

Harm minimisation due to harmful substances or behaviours, can be achieved by the introduction of programs and practices that focus on –

  • Demand – reducing ease of accessibility, information and awareness campaigns, treatment programs, etc;
  • Supply – reducing ease of availability such as border controls and purchasing periods, regulations for defined access, substance intercepts such as seizures and arrests, substance location identification such as waste water analysis, defined minimum purchasing age, etc;
  • Harm – supporting behaviour change such as needle exchange programs, opioid-dependence treatment programs, sobering up services, safe injection sites, safe sex programs, drink-driving messages, slip slop slap programs, sunscreen campaigns, mandatory seat belts, road and vehicle speed limits, etc.

“Harms” can include –

  • Health – injury, chronic conditions, preventable diseases, mental health problems, road trauma, etc;
  • Social – crime, intergenerational trauma, domestic and family violence, child protection, etc;
  • Economic – healthcare costs, law enforcement costs, reduced productivity costs, criminal activity consequences, etc.

Harm minimisation strategies target specific issues — often with specific population groups — and develop strategies to minimise the harm caused by the behaviour. If we consider pharmaconutrition, then there are groups of people who are prescribed specific drugs known to confer both benefits and harms, and the harm minimisation concept could be utilised to optimise their health outcomes.

Harm minimisation and clinical application

Currently the impact of prescribed medications on nutritional status, and the impact of nutrition factors on the effects of prescribed medications is considered to be a clinical-only issue. However, it is an issue that could be included in the harm minimisation concept, particularly in the areas of health and economics.

EXAMPLE – Metformin and thiamine

Issue. We know that thiamine and metformin compete for absorption, distribution and excretion as both utilise the same transporters; whichever substance occupies the transporter first means the other substance cannot.

Target Group. People diagnosed with non-insulin dependent diabetes and prescribed metformin.

Strategies. The distribution of education material through diabetes support groups, diabetes clinics, and GP and Endocrinologist waiting rooms. Content would include advice regarding the importance of monitoring thiamine levels on a regular basis, such as annually, whilst metformin is prescribed. This strategy also indirectly informs and reinforces to the GPs and Endocrinologists the importance of regular monitoring of thiamine status.

Outcome – this is a low-cost strategy that can be broadly distributed to the target group at relatively low cost. It also means earlier intervention in delaying/minimising thiamine deficiency-induced outcomes in those who are prescribed metformin for the management of their diabetes.

The concept can be applied to other discreet, identifiable groups such as those with parkinsons disease, epilepsy, mental health, and many others.

Clinical Questions

What actions will you initiate to increase awareness of importance of pharmaconutrition – will you –

  • develop leaflets for those in your care with discreet chronic illness and prescribed specific medications?
  • speak to a range of chronic unwellness groups about the importance of monitoring nutritional factors impacted by their prescribed medications?
  • organise a half-day education session for health professionals, with a range of topics relating to medicine and nutrition and include a specific presentation on pharmaconutrition?
  • schedule a “pharmaconutrition year” whereby every month there is as awareness-creating strategy such as a poster campaign, editorial in the local newspaper, stall at a local Festival/Show, request your local MP to fund a mailout, etc, targeting both the community and health sector?

This is based on current research. Your choice is whether to include this information into your clinical practice before it is integrated into Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Conclusions

Pharmaconutrition can fit nicely into the harm minimisation concept.

Case study

The comments refer to the drug-nutrient, drug-food, and PharmacoNutrition effects only.

Data summary

Medical History with Nutritional Aspect

Image of diagnoses for Mrs ABY in our MedNut Mail article Harm minimisation and pharmaconutrition

Biochemistry with Pharmaconutritional Consequences

No recent relevant biochemistry available.

Medications That May Adversely Affect Nutritional Status

Image of prescribed medicines for Mrs ABY in our MedNut Mail article Harm minimisation and pharmaconutrition

Biochemistry comments

No recent relevant biochemistry available. Advisable to check plasma proteins (albumin, total proteins) as they are the primary transporters for five of the prescribed drugs and hypoproteinaemia may alter their effects and side effects.

Glycaemic comments

Olanzapine may alter glycaemia.

Bowel management comments

  Regular intervention prescribed – no.

  PRN interventions prescribed – no.

  Nurse Initiated interventions administered – no.

Staff comments

Staff advise Ms ABY has been prescribed vitamin D since admission, and possibly before then. Advisable to clarify vitamin D levels and if still low then advisable to review the current management strategy.

Observations

Ms ABY is a small, pale, charming lady with a significant kyphosis, who told me she eats well and does not appear to be overweight.

Pharmaconutrition comments

Ferrous sulfate decreases zinc absorption therefore advisable to clarify zinc status and if low then consider a short term intervention.

Staff advise Ms ABY has been prescribed an iron intervention since admission, and possibly before then. Long term oral iron interventions are not recommended, therefore advisable to clarify iron status and if –

  • within acceptable range then review necessity for its continued prescription,
  • low then consider an alternate, non-oral intervention such as an iron infusion.

Image of summary matrix for drug-nutrient interactions for Ms ABY from the case study in our MedNut Mail article Harm minimisation and pharmaconutrition

What else would you include?

Download free pdf

Please read this as it is important …

The information in this article is provided to support Health Professionals. It is not an exhaustive protocol and Health Professionals are advised that adequate professional supervision is accessed to ensure that Duty of Care obligations with respect to safe administration of medicines is met for each consumer.

MedNut Mail is a free weekly email that consists of 2 components, being:

  • an editorial - based on some aspect of PharmacoNutrition, and
  • a case study - difficult, simple, all real-life (and not identifiable).

Includes examples of how to integrate this information into your clinical assessments.

Image of our MedNut Mail icon for our articles on drug-nutrient, drug-food, and pharmaconutrition interactions

Want to make sure you do not miss any articles?

Then subscribe now and have it delivered to your inbox!

Malcare WordPress Security